Labours’ contradictory connections in the Nigerian oil space: Alienations and the potential for re-connections to nature and neighbors
Auteur(s) : Houeland Camilla ;
There is an assumed conflict of interest between labour and environmental concerns, especially relating to jobs in industries with high environmental and/or climate impacts such as fossil industries (Räthzel & Uzzell, 2011). However, the emergent scholarship on environmental labour studies emphasise alliances across labour and environmental movements (Räthzel, Stevis, & Uzzell, 2021). In this tradition, this article is interested in exploring how Nigerian oil workers’ express connections to nature and other social groups through experiences with the environment and climate change. Oil workers in Nigeria is as a critical case. Nigeria is characterised by strong socioeconomic inequalities, socio-political fragmentations and socioecological disconnections. We have argued elsewhere that oil workers’ can be described as alienated from the labour process; their life purpose; nature; and social groups (Jordhus-Lier, Houeland, & Ellingvåg, 2021). However, ‘the geographies of labour alienation [are], partial and contested processes (Jordhus-Lier et al., 2021: 333), and the counter-politics to alienation is de-alienation, or what we call “the politics of reconnection”(Ibid). Although considered economically and socially privileged, oil workers in Nigeria find themselves under increasingly precarious conditions and in a physical context where petroleum production and contestations have caused environmental degradations and climate change challenging alternative livelihoods, their own health and their children’s’ life chances. This paper seeks to understand the current alienations and the potential for oil workers’ reconnection/s with other social groups through their expressed interests and experiences with nature. The paper is based on four focus group interviews with oil workers (2 trade union organised; community workers; and artisanal refinery workers) in Port Harcourt 2020. We asked about their work, their relation to nature, their experiences with environmental degradation and climate change and how they think about their own and other’s agency and responsibility.
Mot-clé :
Conectez vous pour accéder au texte complet
[caldera_form id="CF601abc919576c"]Toutes les communications appartenant au même panel :
- African Trade Unions International Agency and Pan-African (Dis)Unity par Bellucci Stefano
- Labours’ contradictory connections in the Nigerian oil space: Alienations and the potential for re-connections to nature and neighbors par Houeland Camilla
- Ethiopia’s Proletarian Insurgency and the Work of Trade Unions par Admasie Samuel
- Trade Union Responses to economic liberalisation in Ghana par Asafu-Adjaye Prince
- Locked into the Lusophone Sphere: Why Cabo Verdean Trade Unions Struggle to Attract International Support par Dr Mark McQuinn
- The issues of trade union freedoms and social conflicts in Algeria. par Hamitouche Youcef
Voir le panel / The Responses of Indigenous Trade Unions to the Deepening of Neoliberalism in Africa
Voir tous les panels du colloque Au prisme du travail : capitalisme, développement et changement social dans le Sud global